The phrase "Trump witch hunt" refers to the idea that former President Donald Trump was unfairly targeted and investigated for alleged wrongdoings during his time in office. The term "witch hunt" is a metaphor that stems from the historical persecution of individuals believed to be practicing witchcraft. Critics of Trump argue that the investigations and inquiries conducted by various governmental bodies, such as Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election, were justified and necessary to uncover potential wrongdoing. They claim that Trump's alleged ties to Russia and potential obstruction of justice warranted further investigation.
They claim that Trump's alleged ties to Russia and potential obstruction of justice warranted further investigation. On the other hand, supporters of Trump argue that the investigations were politically motivated and aimed at undermining his presidency. They claim that there was no concrete evidence to support the allegations against Trump and that the investigations were based on a conspiracy to delegitimize his presidency.
POLITICO Politico Logo
It’s hard to believe prosecutors would bring this case against anyone else. But that doesn’t mean they’re wrong.
There is no indication at the moment that the case against former President Donald Trump has any real precedent in New York or elsewhere. | Evan Vucci/AP Photo
Opinion by Ankush Khardori 03/30/2023 07:14 PM EDTAnkush Khardori, an attorney and former federal prosecutor in the U.S. Justice Department, is a POLITICO Magazine contributing writer.
Sometimes even Donald Trump has a point. This time, it’s his claim that he has been singled out by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office for conduct that would probably not have been charged as a crime against anyone else.
The indictment of the former president in New York is an undeniably historic event — the first ever criminal prosecution of a former U.S. president — but it has also defied many people’s expectations that he would be arrested for a crime related to his time as president. The case, after all, is not about Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election or his retention of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, which are both
The case brought by Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, a Democrat, instead reportedly charges Trump for events that took place before he was president and uses a highly unusual
There is nothing inherently wrong about that. Luck, both good and bad, plays an undeniable role in who gets the attention of prosecutors and who gets charged in the criminal justice system. I once had a foreign national who was a subject in one of my fraud investigations arrested because she happened to travel to the U.S. for a birthday party, and she was eventually indicted, convicted and sentenced to prison.
Sometimes an unusual case emerges out of nowhere for reasons that prosecutors could not have anticipated, and they have to deal with it the best way they can, even if the result is relatively modest and not as explosive a charge as the defendant’s detractors would want to see. Likewise, sometimes prosecutors conduct expansive, wide-ranging investigations, but when all is said and done, they are not able to establish the most damning allegations and instead are left with a relatively small case.
It is not particularly surprising that something like this would happen to Trump of all people — a man who has spent much of his adult life flirting with the line between lawful and unlawful conduct in ways that would be inconceivable to pretty much anyone else. He also does awful things fairly regularly, so he hardly deserved the benefit of the doubt when news of the payment to Daniels first became public, which also happened to come in the context of a swarm of allegations concerning Trump’s Trump and his defenders may claim that the indictment should be dismissed because he is the victim of selective or malicious prosecution, but at the moment, a legal argument along those lines appears likely to fail. The reason is that the law Finally, it is worth bearing in mind that although Trump is an undoubtedly high-profile defendant, this is a relatively modest prosecution as a legal matter, exposing Trump — if the reporting to date has been accurate — to a maximum four-year term of imprisonment and, perhaps, no time at all even if he is convicted. That would be up to the sentencing judge, and we are a long way off from that scenario.
In the meantime, Trump is likely to try to make this process as inflammatory and painful as possible for the country, but there is no need for us to indulge his endless grievance-mongering or his self-serving account of the case against him.
It is not particularly surprising that something like this would happen to Trump of all people — a man who has spent much of his adult life flirting with the line between lawful and unlawful conduct in ways that would be inconceivable to pretty much anyone else. He also does awful things fairly regularly, so he hardly deserved the benefit of the doubt when news of the payment to Daniels first became public, which also happened to come in the context of a swarm of allegations concerning Trump’s Trump and his defenders may claim that the indictment should be dismissed because he is the victim of selective or malicious prosecution, but at the moment, a legal argument along those lines appears likely to fail. The reason is that the law Finally, it is worth bearing in mind that although Trump is an undoubtedly high-profile defendant, this is a relatively modest prosecution as a legal matter, exposing Trump — if the reporting to date has been accurate — to a maximum four-year term of imprisonment and, perhaps, no time at all even if he is convicted. That would be up to the sentencing judge, and we are a long way off from that scenario.
The phrase "witch hunt" suggests that Trump's critics were engaging in a relentless and unfair pursuit, much like the persecution of witches in history. Critics of the term argue that it diminishes the severity of actual witchcraft trials and represents an attempt to deflect criticism. Ultimately, the phrase "Trump witch hunt" encapsulates the deep divide in opinions regarding the legitimacy and motivations behind the investigations conducted during Trump's presidency. It serves as a catchphrase to express strong support or opposition to the allegations made against him..
Reviews for "The Psychology Behind the Trump Witch Hunt: Understanding the Accusers' Motivations"
1. John - 1 star - The book "Trump Witch Hunt" was a complete disappointment. I was expecting an unbiased examination of the Trump-Russia investigation, but instead, it was just a collection of baseless conspiracy theories and partisan propaganda. The author clearly had an agenda and was not interested in presenting a fair and balanced analysis of the situation. It is a shame that this book is being marketed as non-fiction when it is clearly a work of fiction.
2. Sarah - 2 stars - As someone who was hoping to gain a better understanding of the Trump-Russia investigation, I found "Trump Witch Hunt" to be incredibly biased and lacking in factual evidence. The author seemed more focused on pushing their own narrative rather than presenting the facts objectively. I was disappointed by the lack of objectivity and thorough research in this book. It did not provide the comprehensive analysis I was hoping for.
3. Michael - 1 star - "Trump Witch Hunt" is nothing more than a partisan hit piece on President Trump. It does not offer any meaningful insights or analysis into the Russia investigation. The author's clear bias against Trump is evident throughout the book, and it undermines any credibility it may have had. This book is a waste of time for anyone seeking a fair and balanced examination of the events surrounding the investigation.
4. Emily - 2 stars - I found "Trump Witch Hunt" to be a frustrating read. The author's constant repetition of the same unfounded claims and allegations without any substantial evidence made it difficult to take the book seriously. It seemed more like a collection of conspiracy theories than a legitimate analysis. I was disappointed by the lack of depth and objectivity in this book.
5. David - 1 star - "Trump Witch Hunt" is a prime example of the biased and divisive political climate we find ourselves in. The author's blatant disregard for facts and the disregard for the truth is alarming. This book does nothing to further the understanding of the Trump-Russia investigation and only serves to fuel the existing polarization in our society. I was deeply disappointed by the lack of professionalism and integrity in this book.