The curse of Frankenstein is a prevalent theme in Mary Shelley's novel, "Frankenstein." It revolves around the consequences and repercussions of Victor Frankenstein's ambition to create life. **One of the central aspects of the curse of Frankenstein is the idea that playing god and tampering with nature leads to disastrous outcomes.** Victor's obsession with creating life drives him to cross ethical boundaries and defy the natural order. By defying nature, he disrupts the balance of life and sets in motion a series of tragic events. This curse is symbolic of the dangers of scientific advancement without consideration for morality and responsibility.
Book Description paperback. Condition: New. Language: ENG. Seller Inventory # 9781570270598
Moving from the peasant revolts of the late Middle Ages to the witch hunts and the rise of mechanical philosophy, Federici investigates the capitalist rationalization of social reproduction. With this wildly ambitious book especially for its relatively slender 240 or so pages , Federici stakes several world-historical claims and tries to stay between three theoretical stools at once, whilst critiquing all three radical feminist, Marxist, and Foucauldian.
This curse is symbolic of the dangers of scientific advancement without consideration for morality and responsibility. Furthermore, **the curse of Frankenstein is also seen in the isolation and alienation experienced by both Victor and his creation.** Victor's obsession with his experiment consumes him, leading him to neglect his relationships and isolate himself from society.
Review- Federici, “Caliban and the Witch”
Silvia Federici, “Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body, and Primitive Accumulation” (2004) – The current vogue for the witchy in certain circles wouldn’t be a vogue if I could get into it. This is due both to my being a cis straight (in both the sexual and the comedic sense) man and, more to the point, because if I’m involved, it’s either timeless or just plain not cool anymore, whatever “it” is. But that hasn’t stopped me from reading and enjoying contemporary classic “Caliban and the Witch.” With this wildly ambitious book (especially for its relatively slender 240 or so pages), Federici stakes several world-historical claims and tries to stay between three theoretical stools at once, whilst critiquing all three: radical feminist, Marxist, and Foucauldian.
From the feminists she takes the thesis that the great witch hunts and to a lesser extent heresy-hunting in general was a war against female power. This was aimed at disciplining and rationalizing the human body in certain ways- the slightly quavering Foucauldian note. That note becomes solid when wedded to the Marxist bottomline: that this disciplining of the body and campaign against female power was a critical part of the primitive accumulation process that led to the take-off of capitalism, and that capitalism and the spectacular oppression of women would be impossible without each other. For added bravura, Federici argues this process in ongoing today in parts of the developing world, as IMF-backed enclosure of commons goes hand in hand with febrile paranoia about women’s independence, both from men and the market order.
I think Federici makes a compelling argument. Like a lot of big claims, there are gaps in the story left by scant sources with which she, perforce, worked. For such large-scale violence — hundreds of thousands dead across three continents — the witch hunts are not well-understood history, and both the witch hunt and the heretic hunt (two different, if sometimes converging, things) tended to erase the voices of those they persecuted, leaving only the inquisitors’ words. But Federici makes valuable deductive points: most importantly why, all of a sudden, in the 16th century, did a campaign against witches, eighty percent of them women, start with such vociferousness? Medieval Europe knew heretic hunts, brutal ones, but did not consider witches heretics until surprisingly late, well into the “early modern” period as most understand it. Why this sudden turn on healers and midwives? Most studies are either too broad (citing a vague general cultural madness) or too narrow (citing a vague local cultural madness) to really answer that question. That this coincided with the crises that led to the rise of capitalism seems obvious in retrospect, one of the signs of a good theory.
This book largely relies on secondary sources. Often, these secondary sources are primary-source heavy works of history or anthropology, but they are secondary sources nevertheless. I’d be curious to know what the scholars Federici cites think about her larger thesis. In my experience, medievalists and early-modernists tend to jealously guard their realms from modernists looking to make points and comparisons. They might dispute many of Federici’s claims, and notice how fast and loose she sometimes plays with periodization. Notably, her claim that capitalism arose as a way to suppress challenges to the feudal order that came from the lower classes, heretics, and women is big and seems anachronistic, placing the cultural resistance cart before the capitalism horse. It doesn’t seem to bolster her main arguments that much, either, except to posit an unbroken thread of resistance to power across the centuries, where the story is probably a lot choppier.
In general, though, this is an exhilarating work of scholarship, passionately argued, wide-ranging, and even profusely illustrated with old woodcuts and the like. Between her unstinting (if at times unorthodox) Marxism and her publication with Autonomedia, one could see this work being ignored to death by the academy… but it’s proving popular with non-academics I know. That’s something. *****
Book Description Paperback. Condition: NEW. Clean and crisp and new!. Seller Inventory # 3749556573
Similarly, the Creature experiences isolation and rejection from the moment of his creation. Neither Victor nor the Creature find acceptance or fulfillment in their existence, further emphasizing the curse that Victor has brought upon himself and the world. Additionally, **the curse of Frankenstein is reflected in the theme of revenge and destruction.** Victor's creation, fueled by anger and loneliness, seeks revenge on his creator, causing destruction and death wherever he goes. This vengeance is a direct result of Victor's actions and is a powerful representation of the curse that haunts him. In conclusion, the curse of Frankenstein is a recurring theme in Mary Shelley's novel. **It explores the consequences of tampering with nature, the isolation experienced by both Victor and his creation, and the theme of revenge and destruction.** Through these elements, Shelley warns of the dangers of ambition, scientific hubris, and the neglect of social and moral responsibilities. The curse of Frankenstein serves as a cautionary tale, reminding readers of the potential consequences of going against nature's laws..
Reviews for "The curse of creation: Frankenstein's experiment and the unintended consequences"
1. Emily - 2 stars - Examine the Curse of Frankenstein was a disappointment for me. I had high hopes for this book since I am a fan of the Frankenstein story, but unfortunately, it failed to deliver. The writing style was confusing and the story felt disjointed. Additionally, the characters were one-dimensional and lacked depth. The plot was predictable and did not offer any new insights into the Frankenstein myth. Overall, I found this book to be underwhelming and would not recommend it to fellow Frankenstein enthusiasts.
2. James - 1 star - As a lover of classic horror literature, I was excited to read Examine the Curse of Frankenstein. However, I was thoroughly disappointed with this book. The writing was dry and lacked creativity. The author failed to bring anything new to the Frankenstein story and it felt like a poor imitation of the original. The characters were forgettable and it was difficult to connect with them on any level. The pacing was also off, with long stretches of dullness followed by rushed and unsatisfying conclusions. I would not recommend wasting your time on this book.
3. Sarah - 2 stars - Examine the Curse of Frankenstein was a letdown for me. The writing style was overly verbose and made it challenging to get through the story. The plot was convoluted and lacked a clear direction. There were too many subplots and unnecessary details that distracted from the main narrative. Additionally, the characters were uninteresting and lacked any real development. Overall, I found this book to be a confusing and tedious read, and I would not recommend it to others.